“We
have discovered that in most cases the systems used by the best are relatively
simple,
based on a limited number of recurring setups that allow the trader to go with
the flow of the market created by the “big players.” - Dr.
Dariusz Swierk
I was thinking of postposing the announcement of the
minors change to the JPY Pairs Pullbacks trading method until June 2014.
However, I’ve decided that those who’re interested in the strategy ought to be
advised of the changes as soon as possible. No matter the strategy one uses,
there would be losing periods. The way one deals with those periods is what
determines the end game. A useful trading method should be OK when used in most
market conditions, but it can’t win always in most market conditions.
1.
The filter in the method is relaxed: The
purpose of filters is to block some possible bogus signals, but it may also
make the trader miss some winning signals as well. While a filter may result in
fewer trader (and more accuracy in certain cases), it doesn’t prevent a
strategy from undergoing alternative losing streaks.
2.
Putting stop on ourselves: There
are times when everything we touch becomes gold, and there are times when everything
we touch becomes something else. There are times when we make money and there
are times when we lose it. Nevertheless, recovery is easy when the loss is controlled.
The stop on our trade helps, but the stop on ourselves helps better. A winning
period may last for weeks or a few months; but so is a losing period. During
the losing period, stops would continue to get hit, and roll-downs would keep
eating into the portfolio. Therefore, we’ll stop trading in a month in which our
loss exceeds 7% of all the total equity, and never open the new sets of trade
until the next month. This is like putting a stop on ourselves.
The most effective way to deal with losing periods
is to stay out of the markets during those periods. We don’t know when that
kind of period may start or end, but we can help in capital preservation (apart
from other risk control methods) when we put the stop on ourselves temporarily.
We also don’t know when a winning period may start or end.
A combination of two positive expectancy systems may
help, but one may frustrate the performance of the other during the
intermittent winning and losing periods. A combination of one negative expectancy
system and one positive expectancy system can’t also improve the statistics so
much – the negativity coming from one may affect the positivity coming from the
other. A combination of two worse expectancy systems makes the trade looks
pitiful indeed!
All experienced traders acknowledge that every good
system has a series of losing streaks and winning streaks. While a losing
streak may cause some drawdown, an ensuing winning streak would compensate for
that. We’re fortunate to be able to handle
our negativity and positivity satisfactorily. When we limit our negativity by a
certain amount, it won’t go beyond that amount.
A bad market condition tends to result in flat performance
or roll-downs for a considerable amount of the time. While that kind of
condition lasts, the experienced trader would simply wait patiently, apply risk
control methods and look forward to a winning streak, which would inevitably
come.
We play
the markets to harness gains in the long run, not to make correct predictions.
This article is ended with the quote below:
“I know instinctively that worrying about the money,
looking at my trading balance is the worst thing I can do. It is important for
a trader to trade the markets, not his or her capital balance. I mean you have
to have capital to trade, but a focus on account balance and not the markets is
a trap.”
- Peter Brandt
Source: www.tallinex.com
Eye-opening trading lessons: Lessons from Expert Traders